Basic and not very extensive testing comparing the execution time of the five supplied answers:
def numpyIndexValues(a, b):
na = np.array(a)
nb = np.array(b)
out = list(na[nb])
return out
def mapIndexValues(a, b):
out = map(a.__getitem__, b)
return list(out)
def getIndexValues(a, b):
out = operator.itemgetter(*b)(a)
return out
def pythonLoopOverlap(a, b):
c = [ a[i] for i in b]
return c
multipleListItemValues = lambda searchList, ind: [searchList[i] for i in ind]
using the following input:
a = range(0, 10000000)
b = range(500, 500000)
simple python loop was the quickest with lambda operation a close second, mapIndexValues and getIndexValues were consistently pretty similar with numpy method significantly slower after converting lists to numpy arrays.If data is already in numpy arrays the numpyIndexValues method with the numpy.array conversion removed is quickest.
numpyIndexValues -> time:1.38940598 (when converted the lists to numpy arrays)
numpyIndexValues -> time:0.0193445 (using numpy array instead of python list as input, and conversion code removed)
mapIndexValues -> time:0.06477512099999999
getIndexValues -> time:0.06391049500000001
multipleListItemValues -> time:0.043773591
pythonLoopOverlap -> time:0.043021754999999995
lambdafunction. - Will Dereham