5
votes

I don't really get this little thingy. I have an abstract class Box with several sub-classes for different types. For example

abstract class Box
class StringBox(val sValue : String) extends Box

The apply method in the companion object for Box is simple:

object Box{
    def apply(s: String)  = new StringBox(s)
    def apply(b: Boolean) = new BooleanBox(b)
    def apply(d: Double)  = new DoubleBox(d)
}

so I can write

    val sb = Box("StringBox)

Okay, writing unapply makes some trouble. My first idea was to use pattern matching on the type, like this this:

def unapply(b: Box) = b match {
  case sb: StringBox => Some(sb.sValue)
  case bb: BooleanBox => Some(bb.bValue)
  case db: DoubleBox => Some(db.dValue)
  case _ => None

}

Which simply doesn't work because of type erasures.

Second attempt was a generic Box[T] with type T and an abstract type member re-defined in each sub classes. For instance:

 abstract class Box[T] {def value : T}
 class StringBox(val sValue : String)  extends Box[String] { 
   override def value : String = sValue
 }

Consequently, I can re write my unapply as:

def unapply[T](b: Box[T]) = b match {
  case sb: Box[String]  => Some(sb.value)
  case bb: Box[Boolean] => Some(bb.value)
  case db: Box[Double]  => Some(db.value)
  case _ => None

Unfortunately, this doesn't work either. So I guess the explicit type reference in Box[String] gets erased as well so I need to use a type manifest instead. Maybe something like:

def unapply[T](b: Box[_])(implicit target: Manifest[T]): Option[T] = {

   if(b.value ==  target) Some(b.value.asInstanceOf[T])
   else None 
}

This code compiles (2.10) but still does not the desired implicit conversion. Why?

Simple question, is there a way to do value extraction without using reflection or a manifest?

What really boggles me is the question if there is a simple(r) way to combine polymorphism and pattern matching? If not, are there other ways in Scala to accomplish a similar effect?

Any idea or suggestions?

Thank you very much.

1

1 Answers

5
votes

Prolly you can try this.. :)

  abstract class Box[T](val v: T)

  object Box {
    def apply(s: String) = new StringBox(s)
    def apply(b: Boolean) = new BooleanBox(b)
    def apply(d: Double) = new DoubleBox(d)

  }

  class StringBox(sValue: String) extends Box(sValue)
  object StringBox {
    def unapply(b: StringBox) = Some(b.v)
  }

  class BooleanBox(sValue: Boolean) extends Box(sValue)
  object BooleanBox {
    def unapply(b: BooleanBox) = Some(b.v)
  }

  class DoubleBox(sValue: Double) extends Box(sValue)
  object DoubleBox {
    def unapply(b: DoubleBox) = Some(b.v)
  }

You can use it as --

  def useCase[T](box: Box[T]) = box match {
    case StringBox("StringBoxxx") => "I found the StringBox!"
    case StringBox(s) => "Some other StringBox"
    case BooleanBox(b) => {
             if (b)  "Omg! its true BooleanBox !"
             else "its false BooleanBox :("
             }
    case DoubleBox(x) => {
                if (x > 3.14)  "DoubleBox greater than pie !"
                else if (x == 3.14) "DoubleBox with a pie !"
                else "DoubleBox less than a pie !"
    }
    case _ => "What is it yaa ?"
  }                                             

  useCase(Box("StringBoxxx")) //> res0: String = I found the StringBox!
  useCase(Box("Whatever !"))  //> res1: String = Some other StringBox
  useCase(Box(true))          //> res2: String = Omg! its true BooleanBox !
  useCase(Box(false))         //> res3: String = its false BooleanBox :(
  useCase(Box(4))             //> res4: String = DoubleBox greater than pie !
  useCase(Box(3.14))          //> res5: String = DoubleBox with a pie !
  useCase(Box(2))             //> res6: String = DoubleBox less than a pie !