Short answer: in POST requests, values are sent in the "body" of the request. With web-forms they are most likely sent with a media type of application/x-www-form-urlencoded
or multipart/form-data
. Programming languages or frameworks which have been designed to handle web-requests usually do "The Right Thing™" with such requests and provide you with easy access to the readily decoded values (like $_REQUEST
or $_POST
in PHP, or cgi.FieldStorage()
, flask.request.form
in Python).
Now let's digress a bit, which may help understand the difference ;)
The difference between GET
and POST
requests are largely semantic. They are also "used" differently, which explains the difference in how values are passed.
When executing a GET
request, you ask the server for one, or a set of entities. To allow the client to filter the result, it can use the so called "query string" of the URL. The query string is the part after the ?
. This is part of the URI syntax.
So, from the point of view of your application code (the part which receives the request), you will need to inspect the URI query part to gain access to these values.
Note that the keys and values are part of the URI. Browsers may impose a limit on URI length. The HTTP standard states that there is no limit. But at the time of this writing, most browsers do limit the URIs (I don't have specific values). GET
requests should never be used to submit new information to the server. Especially not larger documents. That's where you should use POST
or PUT
.
When executing a POST
request, the client is actually submitting a new document to the remote host. So, a query string does not (semantically) make sense. Which is why you don't have access to them in your application code.
POST
is a little bit more complex (and way more flexible):
When receiving a POST request, you should always expect a "payload", or, in HTTP terms: a message body. The message body in itself is pretty useless, as there is no standard (as far as I can tell. Maybe application/octet-stream?) format. The body format is defined by the Content-Type
header. When using a HTML FORM
element with method="POST"
, this is usually application/x-www-form-urlencoded
. Another very common type is multipart/form-data if you use file uploads. But it could be anything, ranging from text/plain
, over application/json
or even a custom application/octet-stream
.
In any case, if a POST
request is made with a Content-Type
which cannot be handled by the application, it should return a 415
status-code.
Most programming languages (and/or web-frameworks) offer a way to de/encode the message body from/to the most common types (like application/x-www-form-urlencoded
, multipart/form-data
or application/json
). So that's easy. Custom types require potentially a bit more work.
Using a standard HTML form encoded document as example, the application should perform the following steps:
- Read the
Content-Type
field
- If the value is not one of the supported media-types, then return a response with a
415
status code
- otherwise, decode the values from the message body.
Again, languages like PHP, or web-frameworks for other popular languages will probably handle this for you. The exception to this is the 415
error. No framework can predict which content-types your application chooses to support and/or not support. This is up to you.
A PUT
request is pretty much handled in the exact same way as a POST
request. The big difference is that a POST
request is supposed to let the server decide how to (and if at all) create a new resource. Historically (from the now obsolete RFC2616 it was to create a new resource as a "subordinate" (child) of the URI where the request was sent to).
A PUT
request in contrast is supposed to "deposit" a resource exactly at that URI, and with exactly that content. No more, no less. The idea is that the client is responsible to craft the complete resource before "PUTting" it. The server should accept it as-is on the given URL.
As a consequence, a POST
request is usually not used to replace an existing resource. A PUT
request can do both create and replace.
Side-Note
There are also "path parameters" which can be used to send additional data to the remote, but they are so uncommon, that I won't go into too much detail here. But, for reference, here is an excerpt from the RFC:
Aside from dot-segments in hierarchical paths, a path segment is considered
opaque by the generic syntax. URI producing applications often use the
reserved characters allowed in a segment to delimit scheme-specific or
dereference-handler-specific subcomponents. For example, the semicolon (";")
and equals ("=") reserved characters are often used to delimit parameters and
parameter values applicable to that segment. The comma (",") reserved
character is often used for similar purposes. For example, one URI producer
might use a segment such as "name;v=1.1" to indicate a reference to version
1.1 of "name", whereas another might use a segment such as "name,1.1" to
indicate the same. Parameter types may be defined by scheme-specific
semantics, but in most cases the syntax of a parameter is specific
to the implementation of the URIs dereferencing algorithm.