When I want to prevent other event handlers from executing after a certain event is fired, I can use one of two techniques. I'll use jQuery in the examples, but this applies to plain-JS as well:
1. event.preventDefault()
$('a').click(function (e) {
// custom handling here
e.preventDefault();
});
2. return false
$('a').click(function () {
// custom handling here
return false;
});
Is there any significant difference between those two methods of stopping event propagation?
For me, return false;
is simpler, shorter and probably less error prone than executing a method. With the method, you have to remember about correct casing, parenthesis, etc.
Also, I have to define the first parameter in callback to be able to call the method. Perhaps, there are some reasons why I should avoid doing it like this and use preventDefault
instead? What's the better way?
preventDefault
does not prevent other handers from executing. That's whatstopImmediatePropagation
is for. – Crescent Fresh