The CSS rules visibility:hidden
and display:none
both result in the element not being visible. Are these synonyms?
19 Answers
display:none
means that the tag in question will not appear on the page at all (although you can still interact with it through the dom). There will be no space allocated for it between the other tags.
visibility:hidden
means that unlike display:none
, the tag is not visible, but space is allocated for it on the page. The tag is rendered, it just isn't seen on the page.
For example:
test | <span style="[style-tag-value]">Appropriate style in this tag</span> | test
Replacing [style-tag-value]
with display:none
results in:
test | | test
Replacing [style-tag-value]
with visibility:hidden
results in:
test | | test
They are not synonyms.
display:none
removes the element from the normal flow of the page, allowing other elements to fill in.
visibility:hidden
leaves the element in the normal flow of the page such that is still occupies space.
Imagine you are in line for a ride at an amusement park and someone in the line gets so rowdy that security plucks them from the line. Everyone in line will then move forward one position to fill the now empty slot. This is like display:none
.
Contrast this with the similar situation, but that someone in front of you puts on an invisibility cloak. While viewing the line, it will look like there is an empty space, but people can't really fill that empty looking space because someone is still there. This is like visibility:hidden
.
One thing worth adding, though it wasn't asked, is that there is a third option of making the object completely transparent. Consider:
1st <a href="http://example.com" style="display: none;">unseen</a> link.<br />
2nd <a href="http://example.com" style="visibility: hidden;">unseen</a> link.<br />
3rd <a href="http://example.com" style="opacity: 0;">unseen</a> link.
(Be sure to click "Run code snippet" button above to see the result.)
The difference between 1 and 2 has already been pointed out (namely, 2 still takes up space). However, there is a difference between 2 and 3: in case 3, the mouse will still switch to the hand when hovering over the link, and the user can still click on the link, and Javascript events will still fire on the link. This is usually not the behavior you want (but maybe sometimes it is?).
Another difference is if you select the text, then copy/paste as plain text, you get the following:
1st link.
2nd link.
3rd unseen link.
In case 3 the text does get copied. Maybe this would be useful for some type of watermarking, or if you wanted to hide a copyright notice that would show up if a carelessly user copy/pasted your content?
There is a big difference when it comes to child nodes. For example: If you have a parent div and a nested child div. So if you write like this:
<div id="parent" style="display:none;">
<div id="child" style="display:block;"></div>
</div>
In this case none of the divs will be visible. But if you write like this:
<div id="parent" style="visibility:hidden;">
<div id="child" style="visibility:visible;"></div>
</div>
Then the child div will be visible whereas the parent div will not be shown.
With visibility:hidden
the object still takes up vertical height on the page. With display:none
it is completely removed. If you have text beneath an image and you do display:none
, that text will shift up to fill the space where the image was. If you do visibility:hidden the text will remain in the same location.
display: none;
It will not be available on the page and does not occupy any space.
visibility: hidden;
it hides an element, but it will still take up the same space as before. The element will be hidden, but still, affect the layout.
visibility: hidden
preserve the space, whereas display: none
doesn't preserve the space.
Display None Example:https://www.w3schools.com/css/tryit.asp?filename=trycss_display_none
Visibility Hidden Example : https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/tryit.asp?filename=trycss_visibility
If visibility property set to "hidden"
, the browser will still take space on the page for the content even though it's invisible.
But when we set an object to "display:none"
, the browser does not allocate space on the page for its content.
Example:
<div style="display:none">
Content not display on screen and even space not taken.
</div>
<div style="visibility:hidden">
Content not display on screen but it will take space on screen.
</div>
display: none
It will remove the element from the normal flow of the page, allowing other elements to fill in.
An element will not appear on the page at all but we can still interact with it through the DOM. There will be no space allocated for it between the other elements.
visibility: hidden
It will leave the element in the normal flow of the page such that is still occupies space.
An element is not visible and Element’s space is allocated for it on the page.
Some other ways to hide elements
Use z-index
#element {
z-index: -11111;
}
Move an element off the page
#element {
position: absolute;
top: -9999em;
left: -9999em;
}
Interesting information about visibility: hidden and display: none properties
visibility: hidden
and display: none
will be equally performant since they both re-trigger layout, paint and composite. However, opacity: 0
is functionality equivalent to visibility: hidden
and does not re-trigger the layout step.
And CSS-transition property is also important thing that we need to take care. Because toggling from visibility: hidden
to visibility: visible
allow for CSS-transitions to be use, whereas toggling from display: none
to display: block
does not. visibility: hidden
has the additional benefit of not capturing JavaScript events, whereas opacity: 0
captures events
One other difference is that visibility:hidden
works in really, really old browsers, and display:none
does not:
The difference goes beyond style and is reflected in how the elements behave when manipulated with JavaScript.
Effects and side effects of display: none
:
- the target element is taken out of the document flow (doesn't affect layout of other elements);
- all descendants are affected (are not displayed either and cannot “snap out” of this inheritance);
- measurements cannot be made for the target element nor for its descendants – they are not rendered at all, thus their
clientWidth
,clientHeight
,offsetWidth
,offsetHeight
,scrollWidth
,scrollHeight
,getBoundingClientRect()
,getComputedStyle()
, all return0
s.
Effects and side-effects of visibility: hidden
:
- the target element is hidden from view, but is not taken out of the flow and affects layout, occupying its normal space;
innerText
(but notinnerHTML
) of the target element and descendants returns empty string.
display:none;
will neither display the element nor will it allot space for the element on the page whereas visibility:hidden;
will not display the element on the page but will allot space on the page.
We can access the element in DOM in both cases.
To understand it in a better way please look at the following code:
display:none vs visibility:hidden
There are a lot of detailed answers here, but I thought I should add this to address accessibility since there are implications.
display: none;
and visibility: hidden;
may not be read by all screen reader software. Keep in mind what visually-impaired users will experience.
The question also asks about synonyms. text-indent: -9999px;
is one other that is roughly equivalent. The important difference with text-indent
is that it will often be read by screen readers. It can be a bit of a bad experience as users can still tab to the link.
For accessibility, what I see used today is a combination of styles to hide an element while being visible to screen readers.
{
clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);
clip-path: inset(50%);
height: 1px;
width: 1px;
margin: -1px;
overflow: hidden;
padding: 0;
position: absolute;
}
A great practice is to create a "Skip to content" link to the anchor of the main body of content. Visually-impaired users probably don't want to listen to your full navigation tree on every single page. Make the link visually hidden. Users can just hit tab to access the link.
For more on accessibility and hidden content, see: