One line or Pipeline solutions
I'll focus on two things:
OP clearly states
I have the edited column names stored it in a list, but I don't know how to replace the column names.
I do not want to solve the problem of how to replace '$'
or strip the first character off of each column header. OP has already done this step. Instead I want to focus on replacing the existing columns
object with a new one given a list of replacement column names.
df.columns = new
where new
is the list of new columns names is as simple as it gets. The drawback of this approach is that it requires editing the existing dataframe's columns
attribute and it isn't done inline. I'll show a few ways to perform this via pipelining without editing the existing dataframe.
Setup 1
To focus on the need to rename of replace column names with a pre-existing list, I'll create a new sample dataframe df
with initial column names and unrelated new column names.
df = pd.DataFrame({'Jack': [1, 2], 'Mahesh': [3, 4], 'Xin': [5, 6]})
new = ['x098', 'y765', 'z432']
df
Jack Mahesh Xin
0 1 3 5
1 2 4 6
Solution 1
pd.DataFrame.rename
It has been said already that if you had a dictionary mapping the old column names to new column names, you could use pd.DataFrame.rename
.
d = {'Jack': 'x098', 'Mahesh': 'y765', 'Xin': 'z432'}
df.rename(columns=d)
x098 y765 z432
0 1 3 5
1 2 4 6
However, you can easily create that dictionary and include it in the call to rename
. The following takes advantage of the fact that when iterating over df
, we iterate over each column name.
# Given just a list of new column names
df.rename(columns=dict(zip(df, new)))
x098 y765 z432
0 1 3 5
1 2 4 6
This works great if your original column names are unique. But if they are not, then this breaks down.
Setup 2
Non-unique columns
df = pd.DataFrame(
[[1, 3, 5], [2, 4, 6]],
columns=['Mahesh', 'Mahesh', 'Xin']
)
new = ['x098', 'y765', 'z432']
df
Mahesh Mahesh Xin
0 1 3 5
1 2 4 6
Solution 2
pd.concat
using the keys
argument
First, notice what happens when we attempt to use solution 1:
df.rename(columns=dict(zip(df, new)))
y765 y765 z432
0 1 3 5
1 2 4 6
We didn't map the new
list as the column names. We ended up repeating y765
. Instead, we can use the keys
argument of the pd.concat
function while iterating through the columns of df
.
pd.concat([c for _, c in df.items()], axis=1, keys=new)
x098 y765 z432
0 1 3 5
1 2 4 6
Solution 3
Reconstruct. This should only be used if you have a single dtype
for all columns. Otherwise, you'll end up with dtype
object
for all columns and converting them back requires more dictionary work.
Single dtype
pd.DataFrame(df.values, df.index, new)
x098 y765 z432
0 1 3 5
1 2 4 6
Mixed dtype
pd.DataFrame(df.values, df.index, new).astype(dict(zip(new, df.dtypes)))
x098 y765 z432
0 1 3 5
1 2 4 6
Solution 4
This is a gimmicky trick with transpose
and set_index
. pd.DataFrame.set_index
allows us to set an index inline, but there is no corresponding set_columns
. So we can transpose, then set_index
, and transpose back. However, the same single dtype
versus mixed dtype
caveat from solution 3 applies here.
Single dtype
df.T.set_index(np.asarray(new)).T
x098 y765 z432
0 1 3 5
1 2 4 6
Mixed dtype
df.T.set_index(np.asarray(new)).T.astype(dict(zip(new, df.dtypes)))
x098 y765 z432
0 1 3 5
1 2 4 6
Solution 5
Use a lambda
in pd.DataFrame.rename
that cycles through each element of new
.
In this solution, we pass a lambda that takes x
but then ignores it. It also takes a y
but doesn't expect it. Instead, an iterator is given as a default value and I can then use that to cycle through one at a time without regard to what the value of x
is.
df.rename(columns=lambda x, y=iter(new): next(y))
x098 y765 z432
0 1 3 5
1 2 4 6
And as pointed out to me by the folks in sopython chat, if I add a *
in between x
and y
, I can protect my y
variable. Though, in this context I don't believe it needs protecting. It is still worth mentioning.
df.rename(columns=lambda x, *, y=iter(new): next(y))
x098 y765 z432
0 1 3 5
1 2 4 6